Use this checklist to quickly assess whether your car park CO and NO₂ ventilation system may be non-compliant, underperforming, or legally exposed under AS 1668, AS 1851, and state regulations.
If you answer “No” or “Not sure” to any of the questions below, your asset may be at risk.
☐ Are CO (petrol) and NO₂ (diesel) sensors installed in locations based on gas behaviour and toxicity?
☐ Are sensor set points and time delays configured to meet AS 1668 minimum requirements?
☐ Does the system activate ventilation only when gas levels exceed thresholds, not continuously?
☐ Can the system demonstrate automatic response to elevated gas levels during testing?
☐ Have control settings remained unchanged since commissioning, or been formally revalidated after changes?
☐ Is the car park ventilation system included in the building’s AS 1851 inspection and test schedule?
☐ Are functional tests of fan operation and control logic performed and recorded at required intervals?
☐ Are fire interfaces (fan trips, run-on, or shutdown) tested and documented?
☐ Are inspection records current, complete, and readily available for auditors or regulators?
☐ Are test results reviewed — not just filed — to confirm actual system performance?
☐ Is the ventilation system correctly interfaced with the base building fire control system?
☐ Have interfaces been re-tested following any control, BMS, or electrical upgrades?
☐ Can the system demonstrate compliant behaviour during a fire event or simulated fire condition?
☐ Is responsibility for fire interface testing clearly assigned and documented?
☐ Has the risk of noxious fume exposure been formally identified and controlled?
☐ Can you demonstrate that ventilation activates before gas levels become unsafe?
☐ Are contractors and car park users protected during peak traffic periods?
☐ Would you be confident explaining your controls to a WHS inspector?
☐ Are fans controlled via Variable Speed Drives (VSDs)?
☐ Is ventilation demand-based rather than fixed-time or manual?
☐ Have energy consumption and run hours been reviewed for efficiency?
☐ Is excessive fan runtime causing avoidable wear and maintenance costs?
☐ Is there clear evidence of compliance for insurers, auditors, and fire authorities?
☐ Are roles and responsibilities clearly defined (Owner, Agent, Contractor)?
☐ Would your current documentation support an insurance claim following an incident?
☐ Are directors or committee members confident their duty of care obligations are met?
Most compliance failures in Sydney and Melbourne car parks are configuration, testing, or documentation issues — not equipment failures.
A performance-based compliance review can:
A compliant car park isn’t just ventilated — it’s provable, defensible, and optimised.